PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2)

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey plans to endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president today in Pittsburgh, sending a message both to the state's primary voters and to undecided superdelegates who might decide the close race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Dan Pfeiffer, deputy communications director for the Obama campaign, confirmed that Casey would announce his support during a rally at the Soldiers and Sailors Military Museum and Memorial and that he would then set out with the Illinois senator on part of a six-day bus trip across the state.

The endorsement comes as something of a surprise. Casey, a deliberative and cautious politician, had been adamant about remaining neutral until after the April 22 primary. He had said he wanted to help unify the party after the intensifying fight between Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

"There are few stronger advocates for working families in Pennsylvania than Sen. Casey," Pfeiffer said.

By coming out for Obama, Casey puts himself at odds with many top state Democrats - including Gov. Rendell, Rep. John P. Murtha and Mayor Nutter - who are campaigning for Clinton.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation world/20080328_Bob_Casey_to_endorse_Oba ma_join_bus_tour.html


This will certainly not be enough to win PA for Obama, but it is still great news.

It will help reduce Clinton's margin of victory which will reduce both her momentum and delegate pickups.

Casey is well liked all over the state and should help Obama pick up some working class voters.

The source, reached by The Inquirer yesterday, said that Casey was also impressed with how Obama had stood up to the pressures of the campaign, including recent attacks over the racially incendiary remarks of his former pastor.

Casey's decision was also personal, motivated in part by the enthusiasm his four daughters - Elyse, Caroline, Julia and Marena - have expressed for Obama, the source said. "He thinks we shouldn't be deaf to the voices of the next generation."

Once again, Wright backlash proves vastly less damaging than predicted.

And remember this for when the endorsement is inevitably downplayed as unimportant:
Clinton's campaign in particular has been working to woo Pennsylvania's undeclared superdelegates ahead of the April 22 primary in hopes of building momentum. Sen. Clinton recently hosted U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Pittsburgh, and she and her staff repeatedly have called upon U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Pa.
http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1206670209138890.xml&coll=1

Update: If you don't understand what the Casey name means in PA enjoy this anecdote about Senator Casey's father:

Restricted from seeking another term as Auditor General, Casey declined to seek the office of State Treasurer in 1976. Instead, a county official who also was named Robert Casey won the Democratic primary and the general election, spending virtually no money and doing virtually no campaigning; voters merely assumed that they were voting for the outgoing Auditor General.[citation needed] In 1980 the Republicans launched an extensive advertising campaign to clari fy that "Casey isn't Casey," and the Democratic state treasurer was defeated for re-election. In 1978, yet another candidate named Robert Casey, a different Robert Casey, this one a teacher and ice cream parlor owner, likewise received the Democratic party's nomination for Lieutenant Governor, again with a no-spending, no-campaigning strategy. This Casey, who joined Democratic gubernatorial nominee Pete Flaherty, narrowly lost to Richard Thornburgh and William Scranton III.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Casey%2C_Sr.

Display:


Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 2)

Good News for BO, indeed.  For all of us, really, in the long run.

No crowing.


by a gunslinger on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 04:59:43 AM EST

Sorry...but these endorsements.... (2.00 / 2)

...good for a short burst of press coverage...but, that's about the size of it...'specially in PA.

('Yawnnnnn'...I'm going to bed now.)


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:01:40 AM EST

Re: Sorry...but these endorsements.... (2.00 / 1)

Casey is big in PA.  Some endorsements you can shrug at, but this is big news here.  Heck, even a short press burst is good for Obama right now as long as it is good, positive press.

Name recognition is BIG in Pennsylvania politics, and Casey is one of the most recognized names.  It helps a newcomer like Obama a great deal to have him in his corner.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:08:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sorry...but these endorsements.... (2.00 / 2)

These endorsements are going to determine how quickly the presidential race ends.  Casey is a superdelegate, and as we have heard for weeks now, they're the ones who are going to pick the nominee.  Each one Obama gets means Clinton has to get a higher percentage of the uncommitted to win.  She's already near 80% required to win.


by Skaje on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:15:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I forgot about this pretzel logic... (none / 0)

...the one "according to the Obama rules of SuperDelegate voting," right? That's where the SuperD's are supposed to vote in line with the pledged delegates, correct?

So, while the pledged delegates reflect the will of the CD's/regions they represent; the super delegates are not supposed to reflect the will of the areas they represent (i.e.: under "Obama Rules": Casey should vote for Obama even if Pennsylvania votes for Clinton, much like Kennedy, Kerry and Patrick should vote for Obama even though Massachusetts went solidly for Clinton, as well...except on days ending in a "Y," but only when the election's occurring in a leap year...and, then only when Jupiter aligns with Mars...

...okay, now I get it...

Like I said: "Obama's Rules of SuperDelegate Voting."

'til the lie becomes the truth...


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:38:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I forgot about this pretzel logic... (2.00 / 0)

No one said anything about rules to determine how the supes vote, the theory is simply that the backlash from overturning the pledge delegates would be worse than any perceived advantage with going for Hillary over Obama.

She has to have a very complelling argument if she wants to make that case, beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama can't take the general.

That is no rule, just the best course for any democrat with his/her best self intrests at heart.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:55:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I forgot about this pretzel logic... (2.00 / 1)

It's really amazing the number of people who are willing to willfully not understand the difference between:

A rule forcing someone to do something

and

An argument for why someone should do something


by bawbie on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:27:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I forgot about this pretzel logic... (2.00 / 0)

Huh?  All I said was that Clinton needs a LOT of undecided superdelegates to win, and every one that endorses Obama just makes her job that much harder.  There's just over 250 undecided superdelegates left, Clinton needs around 200 of them to win, assuming the rest of the states go as predicted.

At this rate Obama will pass 2024 total delegates by the time Puerto Rico votes.


by Skaje on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:34:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I forgot about this pretzel logic... (2.00 / 0)

Fine.  Apply the Obama rules of superdelegate voting across the whole country.  Obama would be more than happy to give up Kerry and Kennedy...  

Oh yeah, and have the nomination wrapped up already, too.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:39:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Is it really so hard to stay positive, bobswern? (2.00 / 1)

Isn't it a little corrosive and tiring, all this dismissiveness and bad belly? O, that endorsement doesn't matter. O, he's just a Judas. O, the time has passed when his endorsement would have had an effect. O, noboby knows or respects him anyway? And so on and so forth.

That's got to be a really sad life to lead always looking for something negative to say. Can you possibly have a normal day with all that bile?

I wonder with some people in this supposedly progressive party.


by Olu Oguibe on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:55:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't call someone out in the headline. (2.00 / 1)

That's one of the nastiest things one can do here...or on any blog.

So, it's doubly hypocritical of you...and, these blogs are completely meant to facilitate reasonable discourse, without insulting people directly. (Which I did not do; but you just did.)

Learn it. Love it. Live it.

There's no bile.

I'm calling out hypocrisy. That's what I'm doing.

You're calling me names. That's what you're doing. You're making it personal. That's extremely uncool.


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:08:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't call someone out in the headline. (1.00 / 1)

Please spare us the righteous fury, you are trolling this thread with random junk and straw men, being called non-positive is hardly a call-out unless your skin is thinner than a skinless chicken breast.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:10:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

By the way... (none / 0)


Once again, Wright backlash proves vastly less damaging than predicted.

What does this (quote above) have to do with the rest of the diary?

And, about Casey's popularity in the state, he is now one of that state's U.S. Senators, but coming from a family where an entire side of it is comprised of Democrats that also happen to be PA state employees, their general consensus is that Casey's tenure as Governor was noted for its mediocrity...and that's also a paraphrase from a former head of the state ACLU.


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:36:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It helps if you read the diary (1.00 / 1)

The source, reached by The Inquirer yesterday, said that Casey was also impressed with how Obama had stood up to the pressures of the campaign, including recent attacks over the racially incendiary remarks of his former pastor.

Yes, I'm sure Casey is quite unpopular in PA, forward that to Hillary, I'm sure that is the tact she will want to go with.  


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:41:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: By the way... (2.00 / 1)

He has a 62%/12% approval rating among Dems.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?Rele aseID=1149

Seems somewhat popular.


by routerdude on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:58:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: By the way... (2.00 / 0)

only b/c he hasn't DONE anything of note, good or bad.

and i say this as an obama supporter AND pennsylvanian.

interestingly, though, in the gov's race, Rendell was the outsider running against the casey machine and now they've supported opposite candidates, ie, rendell with the clinton machine, casey w/obama.


by pholkhero on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:23:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 2)

I wonder if this ties into Reid's cryptic comments about activity being done behind the scenes.


by toonsterwu on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:11:39 AM EST

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 2)

A Super a Day, helps keep McCain away?


by a gunslinger on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:18:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (none / 0)

LOL!


by poserM on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 09:00:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 1)

Could be, the inquirer seems to think it is a surprise and that he had said he would wait till after the primary to endorse.  Perhaps the word from the rest of the party is to let your allegience be known so the race finishes quicker.

I have to say though, it seems like if that was the word we would be seeing a lot more than just guys like Casey and Richardson, you would see the bulk of the superdelegates declaring at once.

I think it is more likely that these guys just felt Obama needed some positive media vibes to help transition out of the bad press from Wright.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:19:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 2)

Maybe it's cynical of me to say it, but I wouldn't be surprised if Reid was offering some sort of incentives to the remaining Senators.  After all, when he made those comments, the first thought that crossed my mind was, what can Reid do?  And the 2nd thought was what he had agreed to to get Jeffords to switch, and what he gave Lieberman for him to stay.


by toonsterwu on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:36:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 1)

Surprise endorsement? That makes sense to me and I'll tell you why/ First let me say I don't think that Senator Reid had to offer ANYTHING to get this endorsement.

Also recall that more and more of those supers like the TN governor and others have stated that they want this to end BEFORE the convention and that the Democrats needed to come to closure  SOON on the nomination

Recall the Clinton camps antics of this week, the threatening letter of the wealthy to Pelosi, to retract her statement about the Super delegates going with the will of the voters,  then yesterday Clinton going to Fox noise and stating flat out she intends to have a 'credentials fight' on the convention floor--

which EVERYONE except her wants to avoid, she desperately needs it and she WILL NOT work with other proposals to seat the delegates--

Well, all of the Clinton camp antics are pushing forward these endorsements--last week Richardson, this week Casey--there's not a flood of them, but each one is a strong message to HER because they do NOT like the tactics she's using which can ultimately severly damage the party and throw the election.

So, Thank you Senator Casey for the endorsement!


by Wary on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:52:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

OMG! OMG! How could you? (2.00 / 1)

How could you possibly infer that there would actually be some honest-to-goodness political backroom dealmaking going on here to get folks to vote for Obama!

OMG!

Then, pretty soon, you'd have to admit he's just like Clinton! Then, what would we do?

We can't have the media running around with that type of perception can we?


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:46:01 AM EST

Re: OMG! OMG! How could you? (2.00 / 0)

Hmm, I'm not sure how saying he will pick up votes in PA fits with your proposed conspiracy theory.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 05:52:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

One person influencing one other... (2.00 / 1)

...person to endorse sooner rather than later hardly counts as a "conspiracy theory."

You're putting words in my mouth.

Then again, this is national Democratic politics. So, we know there's never any lobbying done to influence actions to support a certain side or promote a certain outcome, right?

I mean that would never happen to any superdelegate that votes for Obama. We all know that every superdelegate that votes for Obama is doing it purely out of conscience and deep, personal contemplation...totally unaffected by the forces around them...


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:02:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One person influencing one other... (2.00 / 0)

Are you just typing things at random?


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:03:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Words were put in my mouth... (none / 0)

...that weren't there. Now the insults fly in response to my statement that the words were put in my mouth (that weren't there).


by bobswern on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:16:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Words were put in my mouth... (2.00 / 1)

Seeing as my first post was a question as to where the heck your words came from I'm going to have to conclude that you are indeed typing things at random.  Purple monkey dishwasher.


by furiousxgeorge on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:17:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Advocado! (2.00 / 0)


by kraant on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:33:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (2.00 / 1)

Great news!


McCain: The Past, Obama: The Future
by KathyM on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:37 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (2.00 / 1)

It is good news for Obama and he badly needs it. It might help him make some inroads amongst those "Casey Democrats"; I think one of the reasons of endorsing Obama was because Rendell and Casey are enemies and after that 2002 bitter fight, it became worse. Nonetheless, let's see what happens. Endorsements are becoming irrelevant, except for Gov. because they have infrastructure.


by American1989 on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 07:33:33 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (2.00 / 2)

Drip.. drip.. drip..


by XoFalconXo on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:25:20 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (none / 0)

Anyone know how to post a youtube video in their diary?

sorry for the annoyance


"Let them eat cake"
by NCDEM29 on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:36:04 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (2.00 / 1)

Rendell beat Casey by 22 points in their primary. I know whose endorsement I would rather have


by rossinatl on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:36:43 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (2.00 / 0)

This is true.  It's certainly a good thing for Obama to get Casey's endrosement, but Rendell and Nutter are the two biggest fish in the sea in PA, and they're both in the clinton camp.  It'll be interesting to see what effect those two guys have in Philly.  Both are extremely popular in Philly (Rendell probably a little less so since calling PA Democrats racists who wouldn't vote for a Black man...), although Philly is an overwhelmingly pro-Obama demographic and MUST be a stronghold if he is going to win or even stay close in PA.  If Rendell and (especially) Nutter help Hillary to 30-35% in the city of Philadelphia, she will win HUGE statewide.  Obama needs massive turnout and a 4-1 margin in the city.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (2.00 / 1)

Only in Obama World (and thus the fawning pro-Obama media) could this matter.

In Ohio, Barack Obama had many key mayoral endorsements, from Columbus to Cleveland.  He still ended up getting blasted away by a whopping ten plus percentage points and losing 83 of 88 counties!  And this when those ever pro-Obama polls were giving him a "closing up" of the margins.  None of the eve-of-primary polls were anywhere close--Obama was flatly rejected.  And he shall be in Pennsylvania--it is always a sitting governor (not a former) with the proper infrastructure to make a difference.

Obama will go into the Convention having essentially lost all of reliably blue-state America save his own Illinois, and almost every major state.  That's a terrible position to be in, as a Freshman Senator trying to claim to be his party's standard-bearer.

I believe that Hillary will prevail, and I do believe that if she is not the nominee, she must bolt and run independently.  John McCain, whom my own family and friends--sixty years Democrats and never anything else--will be voting for if Obama is the nominee, truly won't mean much of a difference from George Walker Bush.

But Obama, with that very scary twenty-year affiliation with a White-damning pastor, is the most terrifying prospect for the White House in my lifetime.

Whites will turn out in droves to stop him.

Bob Casey knows Obama is toast.  As do all of his other veteran endorsers.  That aspect of the Democratic Party, like the MSM, only wants to stop the Clintons.  The fall campaign afterwards is a foregone conclusion.  


by lambros on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:31 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (2.00 / 1)

LOL.  A "whopping" 10%?!?  After being ahead by 20%+ up until 3 weeks before the election?  Keep spinning like a top...


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 08:50:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (none / 0)

of course it is whopping because Obama outspent Hill by 2-1 and got help from the media, like MSNBC


by American1989 on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 09:57:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA: Sen. Casey (none / 0)

Then let it be done and you can have your fascist America...war, poverty and fascism is a lot better than a guy whose priest said some mean things I suppose.


The Democratic Party doesn't live or die with the Clintons
by nrafter530 on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:09:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I guess that these states aren't blue America (none / 0)

MN-the state with the longest current voting streak for a democrat (dating back to 1980 as all other states only date back to 1988) and what about these states, WI, VT, ME, WA, HI, CT,

Again another meme that should be thrown out because it does the party no favors in places like NoDak where a pick up is possible (2 Dem Senators, Dem Representative) and polarizes the country.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:31:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (none / 0)

This endorsement is driven by payback motivation for the 1992 convention in respect to Casey's father who felt snubbed by the Clintons.


by Liberty on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 09:21:12 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (2.00 / 1)

This is really good news... Clinton's lead is through Casay-Democrats, while Randell-D's look like they are more people who are supporting Obama... Get him in commercials!


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 09:46:11 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (none / 0)

Both senators in Washington endorsed Hillary.  She lost by 10 points.

Endorsement are just hot air.


by Sensible on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 09:58:25 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (none / 0)

In a sense, you are of course correct.  However, it's also one less superdelegate Hillary can convince to steal the nomination for her.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 10:49:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Casey is PA (2.00 / 1)

The Casey name in PA is huge and cannot be easily dismissed. Just look at how badly he trounced Santitorium in '06.

Casey has huge pull with moderate republicans as well.

Also overlooked but also quite significant is the endorsement of Teresa Heinz-Kerry. She is very well respected by both Democrats and Republicans.

I expect Obama to be within 8 points when polls come out on Monday.


by Chimpeach on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:06:39 AM EST

Re: PA: Sen. Casey to Endorse Obama (updatedx2) (2.00 / 1)

Just got off the phone with my PA relatives who are Catholic.  This endorsement was a big surprise to them, they hadn't heard the news - and they don't own computers.  

The Casey family is highly respected in PA, among Catholic families.  My PA cousins are Italian Catholics, Puerto Rican and Black-American Catholics.

Most of my relatives are quietly pro-choice, but a few are not.  But on either side of the issue they have a great deal of respect for Casey for standing up for his views.  

I realize that in some cases endorsements don't mean much, but I think this one does.

I don't expect Barack Obama to win PA, nor does he need to - but I think this will help pull him closer in the state, and he'll walk away with a higher delegate count.  

None of them care about what Ed Rendell thinks. Actually they don't like him very much.  Several (the Philly branch) do like Nutter, but my Philly cousins, most of them, will be voting for Obama.  Two are voting for Hillary.  Thankfully none of my family are still Repubs.  


Anthropologists for human diversity; opposing McCain perversity
by NeciVelez on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:52:39 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.